Competitive intelligence about people

The gathering and analysis of competitive intelligence -- about companies, other law firms and individuals -- helps lawyers and law firms make important decisions.  This article, written by Janet Ellen Raasch, summarizes a presentation by Wanda McDavid and Judy Goater of Access Information, a Denver-based firm that provides competitive intelligence for law firms across the country.  This is part four of a four-part article.  For the complete article, see link below.

Sometimes you need information about an individual rather than a company.  This person could be a client, a prospective client, a competitor, opposing counsel, a potential hire or a potential merger partner.  When you know something about the person you are meeting with, you can plan appropriately.

 

Sometimes, you need other kinds of information about people.  For example, you might need to track down a former employee or a potential witness.  “When such a person has gone ‘off the grid’ electronically, you might not have much to go on,” said Goater.  “This is where creativity comes into play.

 

“In one such case, a former executive had been gone from a company for five years,” said Goater.  “He had a common name, which made the search even more difficult.  Someone recalled him saying that he wanted to take over his family’s farm.  By using the farm subsidy database and narrowing the search by general geographic area and the man’s age, we were able to locate him for our client.”

 

Another reason to search for people is to acquire their contact information for use in a marketing database.  Good sources of contact information include telephone directories, professional directories and professional licensing agencies (if you know a person’s profession).  Online sources include a search on Yahoo! People.

 

Many of the commercial and general resources mentioned in the “companies” research section in this article work just as well for people.

 

“We often use a site called Jigsaw, owned by Salesforce” said Goater.  “It is a business-to-business contract database populated by marketers and salespeople around the country.  By contributing their contacts, users gain access to the database.  It includes 30 million contacts.  It is an especially good source for the contact information of individuals below the usual c-level executives that show up in most directories.”

 

If you know a person’s location, you can search local and regional media for mentions of their names and activities.  Social media – like Martindale Hubbell, LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+, Twitter and YouTube -- are also good resources.  So are blog searches.  Social media include contact information, but they also broaden your research with less formal “chat” about people, their activities and the companies they work for.

 

“In gathering information about people,” said Goater, “you want to use a wide variety of sources – and you want to be very careful to validate any information you find before you act on it.  There is a lot of faulty information out there.  There are also privacy concerns.”

 

Today, information about companies and individuals is widely available. In fact, you could easily drown in all the data.  The trick is to focus your search in light of your business goals.  With this information in hand, you are well-positioned to make good decisions about the future of your law firm – and its work.

 

Competitive intelligence an essential component of better law firm decision-making

 

Competitive intelligence profiles

Th gathering and analysis of competitive intelligence -- about companies, other law firms and individuals -- helps lawyers and law firms make important decisions.  This article, written by Janet Ellen Raasch, summarizes a presentation by Wanda McDavid and Judy Goater of Access Information, a Denver-based firm that provides competitive intelligence for law firms across the country.  This is part three of a four-part article.  For the complete article, see link below.

When preparing to meet with a potential client, lawyers often ask marketers or librarians to prepare a profile of the client.  “All too often,” said McDavid, “this is done just a few hours before the scheduled meeting – and we need to scramble.

 

“Even with very little lead time, you would be surprised at how much information you can turn up by simply visiting and mining the potential client’s website,” said McDavid.  “You should also search company or firm pages on social media sites.”

 

When you have a little more lead time to prepare – like for a proposal or the resulting beauty contest – then you can delve more deeply into client background.  Good sources for public companies include SEC filings.  Good sources for private companies include Dun and Bradstreet reports.

 

A good profile addresses some or all (depending on your time and research skills) of these categories:

 

n      Quick facts

n      Company overview

n      Business segments

n      Products/services

n      Business partners

n      Board of Directors

n      Key executives

n      Key developments

n      Representative clients

n      Legal issues and litigation

n      Locations

n      Case studies

n      Patent information

n      Marketing strategy

n      Competitors

n      Sources

n      News articles

 

Armed with this type of information, your lawyers and law firm are well-prepared to make good decisions about how to approach a potential client (or anyone else), and how to make a good impression once the contact takes place.

Competitive intelligence an essential component of better law firm decision-making

Competitive intelligence on companies, competitors and adversaries

The gathering and analysis of competitive itelligence -- about companies, other law firms and individuals -- helps lawyers and law firms make important decisions.  This article, written by Janet Ellen Raasch, summarizes a presentation by Wanda McDavid and Judy Goater of Access Information, a Denver-based firm that provides competitive intelligence for law firms across the country.  This is part two of a four-part article.  For the complete article, see link below.

 

 

Some sources of competitive intelligence about companies, competitors and adversaries are paid and some are free to the public.  Because of the nature of their work, many law firms and law librarians already have access to many of the paid recourses.  These include products offered by industry giants LexisNexis and Thomson West.

 

 

“For industry research, I also like to use a product called Profound, offered by MarketReserch.com,” said McDavid.  “They offer a wide range of reports for purchase.  An entire report can be costly but, if you know exactly what you are looking for, you can order just part of a report for a lesser fee.

 

“And don’t forget,” said McDavid.  “Many of these paid resources are available for you to use free of charge at the Denver Public Library.”

 

Free resources for company research include www.llrx.com and Zimmerman’s Research Guide (http://law.lexisnexis.com/infopro/zimmermans).  In its database, Zimmerman’s offers links to both company information and company personnel.  “Both of these sites are great places to start if you are trying to get an overview of the kind of research that is out there,” said McDavid.

 

The Virtual Chase product by Justia.com offers business research as well as county and municipal law resources.  Information on companies can be found at Hoovers, Yahoo! Finance, Google Finance, Nexis company information and Valuation Resources.com.

 

“A lot of good research is available from Google,” said McDavid.  “We all know how to do a Google search, but much more refined searches and results are available via the Google Advanced General Search Page.  Google Scholar and Google Advanced Scholar Search offer useful results that have been ‘purged’ of casual hits.”

 

Court and government sites – especially the Secretary of State’s office -- include public records and a wealth of useful information.  “If you want to know where a company is headed,” said McDavid, “check the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Database.”

 

Competitive intelligence an essential component of better law firm decision-making

 

Competitive intelligence an essential component of better law firm decision-making

Important law firm decisions should never be made in a vacuum.  Instead, they should be made with an abundance of the right information in hand.  For many law firm decisions, “the right information” means competitive intelligence.

 

Competitive intelligence is defined as a systematic and ethical program for gathering, analyzing and managing information about the external business environment – information that can affect all of a law firm’s plans, decisions and operations.

 

Competitive intelligence can be information about organizations – like your clients, potential clients and adversaries.  It can be information about other law firms – like collaborators, opposing counsel or even potential merger partners.  It can be information about the legal needs in particular industries or markets.

 

Competitive intelligence can also be information about people – like the people you will meet in a pitch, in the boardroom, in the courtroom (like opposing counsel or an expert witness) or in a hiring interview.

 

In any of these settings, knowledge of companies and people is power.

 

“When gathering competitive intelligence, there is a wrong way and a right way to go about it,” said Wanda McDavid.  “The wrong way is typified by computer hackers like Lisbeth Salander in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.  As much as we enjoy the book and the movie, and want Lisbeth to succeed, we cannot condone her tactics.  This kind of corporate espionage makes for good entertainment, but bad – and unethical – business.

 

“The ethical gathering of competitive intelligence complies with all applicable laws – domestic as well as international,” said McDavid.  “It is obtained from legitimate online and print sources, in both public and subscription databases.  When obtained by interviews (either with targeted competitor staff and customers or as general field research), the ethical interviewer discloses up front both her identity and the purpose of the interview.”

 

McDavid and her colleague Judy Goater discussed the ethical gathering and use of competitive intelligence by law firms at the monthly educational program of the Rocky Mountain Chapter of the Legal Marketing Association (www.legalmarketing.com/rockymountain).  The program was held Jan. 10 at Maggiano’s Little Italy in downtown Denver.

 

McDavid is president and Goater is director of services development at Access Information (www.access-information.com), a Denver-based firm that specializes in the discovery and compilation of competitive intelligence for use by law firms.  Both have master’s degrees in librarianship and vast experience in the legal industry.  The PowerPoint slides from this presentation have been made available on the company website, in the “training” section. 

“Before starting any competitive research project,” said McDavid, “it is essential that you have a plan.  Thanks to the Internet, there are an almost unlimited number of resources out there.  You can waste a lot of time and money searching them all.  If we know your goals for a particular research project, we can help you concentrate your resources on the most likely, valid and reliable sources for your purpose.”

This is party one of a four-part article.  For the complete article, see

Competitive intelligence an essential component of better law firm decision-making

 

 

LMA Conference Synopsis: Improving Visibility

The Legal Marketing Association provides guidance on marketing, business development and communications within the legal profession.  This article summarizes a presentation by Betsi Roach, executive director of the LMA, on important themes that emerged at the 25th annual LMA Conference held last month, as well as recent LMA developments.  This excerpt covered the third of four conference tracks:  Improving visibility.  This ia part four of a six-part article.  For a link to the entire article, see below.

“As professional marketers, we devote much of our time to improving the visibility of a lawyer, an industry or practice group, or a law firm within a targeted market,” said Roach

 

“The first session in this track focused on social media – and how to use these robust yet cost-effective tools to distribute content, raise visibility and build a network of new leads.  Also covered were social media policies and ethical concerns,” said Roach.

 

Winners of the 2011 LMA Your Honor awards participated in a panel to discuss the strategy and tactics of their cutting-edge campaigns.  Other sessions discussed the processes and value of various legal directories, rankings and “pay to play” opportunities; ways in which law firm professionals can assist the firm’s clients manage negative publicity and maximize positive publicity; and how small and mid-sized law firms can “do more with less” in their marketing budgets.

For the full article:  LMA Conference Synopsis: Improving Visibility

Lawyers embracing social media

According to research conducted for LexisNexis, 86 percent of lawyers under the age of 35 are members of social networks like LinkedIn, Facebook and MySpace.  Among lawyers age 46 and older, a surprising 66 percent are members of social media.  Obviously, the role of social networks in marketing a law practice cannot be ignored.

These stats were cited in an article that appeared in Sunday's The New York Times.  The article has received a lot of attention because it discusses the situation of a lawyer who was reprimanded and fined by the Florida Bar Association for an intemperate blog post.

All of those lawyers -- younger and older -- who are now using social media would to well to remember that publishing is publishing.  The ethics requirements governing the conduct of lawyers don't change just because you are online.  Use social media -- but do not publish anything there that you would not publish in a magazine or newspaper.

Constant Content: Set in Style interview

Thanks to Mister Thorne of the Set in Style blog, who posted a nice interview regarding my practice.  Questions and answers include:

What does a ghostwriter do?

What are the ethics of ghostwriting for lawyers?

How do you "bridge the gap" between lawyers and readers?

How can attorneys get articles published?

What is it like to work with lawyers and law firms?

How does your journalism and teaching background affect your work?

What is an attorney's "on-line reputation"?

How important is design?

What are the elements of persuasive writing?

How can young attorneys use writing to enhance their careers?  Partners?

Who is your ideal client?  What is your ideal project?

What is the best part of your job?

Changes to Colorado Rules: Allow trade names, referral agreements

When the revised Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct took effect Jan. 1, 2008, Colorado law firms were allowed to practice under trade names.  The changes also allow a Colorado lawyer to enter into a reciprocal referral agreement with another lawyer or non-lawyer.  In this July 2007 article, Nancy Cohen (chief deputy regulation counsel with the Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel) and Reba Nance (director of law practice management and risk managment for the Colorado Bar Association)  discuss these changes to the Colorado rules.

Changes to Colorado Rules allow trade names, referral agreements

Great idea! But is it ethical? Quagmire of states' ethics rules makes it tough to tell

Currently, the rules of professional conduct established by the American Bar Association and generally adopted by the state courts vary greatly from state to state -- which has become a major issue as more law firms are competing regionally, nationally and even internationally.  It is difficult to know just which set of ethics rules governs the game.  In this May 2005 article, Will Hornsby (staff counsel to the ABA Division for Legal Services) and Denver lawyer Michael Berger discuss how law firms can best comply with ethics rules.

Great idea!  But is it ethical?  Quagmire of states' ethics rules makes it tough to tell