Larry Bodine: Turning your bio into a magnet for business

As my regular readers know, I believe that most attorney biographies are a waste of valuable online real estate that only hit on one persuasive cylinder -- and not very well at that.

Marketing tools (and I include bios in this category) work best when they demonstrate three qualities (first outlined by Aristotle in his Rhetoric)  -- intelligence, good character (shared values) and friendliness (concern for the client).

Most attorney bios attempt to demonstrate intelligence through a boring list of credentials, and totally ignore shared values and client-centricity.  Intelligence can be further enhanced and client-centricity demonstrated by the use of good "case stories" (more than simple case citations) that show how you solve problems for clients.  Shared values can be demonstrated by personal quotes that demonstrate your personal and professional character.

Lawyer and consultant Larry Bodine elaborates on this subject in an excellent recent article, "Turning your bio into a magnet for business."

Smart lawyers turns their bios into a marketing magnet that generates leads, as opposed to a mere resume or a CV, which recites only your education and epxerience.  The trick is to turn a feature of yourself into a benefit to the client.

Bodine continues:

You may have a great resume, but it will just list all the place that you worked.  But when you go into practice, your bio should answer these questions:  What have you done for people?  What have you accomplished?  How have you helped people?  Can you give me some examples?  Writing a bio is completely different from a resume.  it really requires a mental shift.

I agree completely.  Invest in the re-writing of your attorney bio as a persuasive marketing document -- and then post this "profile" not only on your firm Web site, but also on the full range of relevant social networking and content sites.  By doing this, you can easily and inexpensively "own" the first page of search results for your name.

Using LinkedIn Groups for legal marketing purposes

Do you use LinkedIn Groups for legal marketing purposes?  There's been a heated discussion of the pro's and con's of this tactic in Larry Bodine's listserv (membership required).  Here's what I added today:

Funny that this conversation should be top-of-list today.  Yesterday I joined about ten additional LinkedIn groups -- mostly for the "branding" value of having their logos on my profile.  (I already belonged to six of them.)  I think that these logos can provide some sense of the field in which you are playing and willing to make a contribution.  For the most part, I only joined groups that showed up high in a search for relelvant legal marketing and socia media terms -- that also featured a significant number of members.

How do I use LinkedIn groups?  Mostly like I use my aggregator -- to quickly skim for breaking news and concepts.  Yes, there are a lot of annoying and blatant sales folks there.  Ignore them.  I comment now and then when I think that I can add value to a good conversation (most recently on the repurposing of lawyer bios as profiles for online marketing).  I have received numerous inquiries and some new writing work from LinkedIn groups.  I noticed that LMA (I am assuming) is adding chapter groups to foster intra-chapter communications and linking.  As a result of my day playing around on LinkedIn groups, I became just the second member to join the Rocky Mountain Chapter group!  Come on gang, let's get cracking!

 

I really think that it is too soon to tell.  Better (especially for lawyers) to find a few narrowly focused groups (or create one) and participate by adding high-value content to the discussion.  I have joined more than that because I am using these groups primarily for industry research -- not for promoting my own practice as a writer and ghostwriter for lawyers and law firms.

More data: Reporters rely on socia media

According to a post by Larry Bodine, an overwhelming majority of reporters and editors now depend on social media sources when researching their stories.  Larry gets his data from a national survey conducted by Cision and Don Bates of George Washington University.

89 percent use blogs for story research

65 percent use social networks for story research

61 percent use Wikipedia for story research

52 percent use microblogs like Twitter for story research

Mainstream media have clearly hit a tipping point in their reliance on social media for research and reporting.  What do reporters and editors find out about you when they search these sources while researching and writing an article?

Have you populated blogs, social networks, content sites, Wikis and Twitter with the kind of informative, useful content that positions you as a reputable source for a reporter or editor?

Create good content.  Post it on sites that accept user-generated content.